Server NT Vs Server 2000

Hi friends

This articles give the compare and contrast chart of features between server NT and server 2000. The following points in each category makes comparison respectively.

SERVER NT:

1. SAM(Security account manager) database for user acc creations
2. No AD
3. PDC, BDC(has no write permission) env
4. No fsmo roles
5. Dhcp works independently
6. No ICS,NAT,VPN,RRAS,ATM
7. No IE 4.0 and IE 5.0
8. No NLB and Clustering
9. No predictable end to end ,QOS
10. No IAS,RADIUS,Kerberos V5
11. No EFS
12. No development support
13. No terminal services
14. No IIS 5.0 ,ASP
15. No IPP(Internet printing protocol)
16. No disk quota,DFS,etc

SERVER 2000 :

1. No SAM Database, inspite AD is used
2. AD Env (adv features integrates features like ease mgmt,centralized replication,etc)
3. PDC,ADC environment
4. Fsmo(flexible single master operation role) for replication b/w DC
5. Dhcp works paralelly with dns and AD
6. ICS,NAT,VPN,RRAS,ATM are added features
7. IE 4.0 and IE 5.0 supports Http compression
8. Supports NLB(network load balancing) and Clustering
9. Has predictable end to end ,QOS(quality of services)
10. Has improved authentication strategy like IAS,RADIUS,Kerberos V5
11. Support EFS(Encryption file system)
12. Has development support (VB 6.0)
13. Has terminal services
14. IIS 5.0, ASP are present
15. IPP(Internet printing protocol) are present
16. Disk quota mgmt,DFS are available

Thanks

Logu
logu_microsoft@hotmail.com
91-98414-99143